| To: | "Kevin D. Kissell" <kevink@paralogos.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Is there no way to shared code with Linux and other OSes? |
| From: | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
| Date: | Sat, 22 Nov 2008 11:13:31 +0100 (CET) |
| Cc: | Chad Reese <kreese@caviumnetworks.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <4927D6E0.4020009@paralogos.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <4927C34F.4000201@caviumnetworks.com> <4927D6E0.4020009@paralogos.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Sat, 22 Nov 2008, Kevin D. Kissell wrote:
> [This should be good for some useless weekend flaming.]
Yeah! ;-)
> Chad Reese wrote:
> to move away from such arbitrary dogmatism. The argument given for banning
> typedefs altogether is that nested typedefs are confusing to programmers. I
I thought the main reason was that you can't have forward declarations of
typedefs, while you can have for structs.
Hence
typedef struct {
...
b_t *p;
} a_t;
typedef struct {
...
a_t *p;
} b_t;
won't fly.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Is there no way to shared code with Linux and other OSes?, Kevin D. Kissell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Is there no way to shared code with Linux and other OSes?, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Is there no way to shared code with Linux and other OSes?, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Is there no way to shared code with Linux and other OSes?, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |