linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] New IDE/block driver for OCTEON SOC Compact Flash interface.

To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] New IDE/block driver for OCTEON SOC Compact Flash interface.
From: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 14 Nov 2008 01:18:51 +0000
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
In-reply-to: <491CC0B6.8020400@ru.mvista.com>
Organization: Red Hat UK Cyf., Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SL4 1TE, Y Deyrnas Gyfunol. Cofrestrwyd yng Nghymru a Lloegr o'r rhif cofrestru 3798903
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <491C7F28.2070507@caviumnetworks.com> <491CC0B6.8020400@ru.mvista.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
> OTOH, CF support via self-contained driver is certainly a waste of code 
> since IDE core and (libata) are here to drive the CF devices as well. 
> What we need is a "normal" IDE or libata (at your option) driver.

A libata driver would be nice and probably easiest to do as you don't
have to pretend to be close to old style taskfile IDE for a PC.

I am not convinced there is no case for a 'dumb' small CF driver, but if
so the chipset code and the core code need to be separated as the other
requests I see for this are different embedded boxes wanting to keep
codesize down.

Alan

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>