On Tue, 28 Oct 2008, Ralf Baechle wrote: > Intentional omission. We didn't do that before and Cavium didn't seem to > need it so we can put off fixing that for a little longer. It needs a > little thought to get NUMA right ... Fair enough, but it is left a bit ambiguous in your description. Maciej |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH 11/36] MIPSR2 ebase isn't just CAC_BASE, Maciej W. Rozycki |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 02/36] Add Cavium OCTEON files to arch/mips/include/asm/mach-cavium-octeon, David Daney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 11/36] MIPSR2 ebase isn't just CAC_BASE, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 09/36] Enable mips32 style bitops for Cavium OCTEON., Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |