| To: | rtc-linux@googlegroups.com, Linux-MIPS <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>, Kevin Hickey <khickey@rmicorp.com>, Manuel Lauss <mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [RFC PATCH] Au1xxx on-chip counter-as-RTC driver |
| From: | Alessandro Zummo <alessandro.zummo@towertech.it> |
| Date: | Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:59:27 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20081028105220.GA1235@roarinelk.homelinux.net> |
| Organization: | Tower Technologies |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20080809161402.15e24b2e@flagship.roarinelk.net> <20081021203815.1a0a246d@i1501.lan.towertech.it> <20081022073114.GA11169@roarinelk.homelinux.net> <20081028111704.2feb3b53@i1501.lan.towertech.it> <20081028105220.GA1235@roarinelk.homelinux.net> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Tue, 28 Oct 2008 11:52:20 +0100 Manuel Lauss <mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net> wrote: > > I'd need some feedback from linux-mips, otherwise > > I can only Sign-off for the entries in drivers/rtc . > > I stripped the alchemy board parts away from the patch; they can go in > through the mips tree at a later time. ok. > > Btw why are you using a lock? the rtc class core > > already provides his own lock for the ops calls. > > Didn't know that; I mostly looked at rtc-sh.c for guidance which also > uses its own locks. I think it's due to the interrupt handling in rtc-sh. -- Best regards, Alessandro Zummo, Tower Technologies - Torino, Italy http://www.towertech.it |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [RFC PATCH] Au1xxx on-chip counter-as-RTC driver, Manuel Lauss |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] tx4938ide: Avoid underflow on calculation of a wait cycle, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [rtc-linux] Re: [RFC PATCH] Au1xxx on-chip counter-as-RTC driver, Manuel Lauss |
| Next by Thread: | Question about rdhwr emulation., David Daney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |