linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] TXx9: Add TX4938 ATA support (v2)

To: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] TXx9: Add TX4938 ATA support (v2)
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 22:52:25 +0200
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, ralf@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date :user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=aU+d+FEGGF6tNpFJlOslHFGG+mWi4YH8kTqjiYO+Yzo=; b=b8nbZljTAXSxN1nVNgyQqngCUhJXY4+QCVjbkgIl9r3KQWAbgWsjZh66PB8ce1YqI5 w4K81rnbB7grYTj/FnAS5By69v+hjYBYsFcvYlLPnBYKC41XfmyEPpdGrMj4Yhy8c9eD ZHcAFC2jnUXw7bYi4JUrCqvxcrCrKhgJqp0xw=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to :mime-version:content-disposition:message-id:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=AD+Q/oRgR5S+Dq8I6Rz/YJmMGUCF7ZKr4/ZstGnW7/E+1gUr2PgW6LKn6WKYtJ5y3v HmbhFqLwj0NJ3RLxJQIhgWgMggdz6OV4uoAHFSUOLsvShp185EtRk1BasdPLwsJjqzl3 l4wdintaH2nKYELyei6w5staj2woWRb3Au9IA=
In-reply-to: <4900F8DE.4070203@ru.mvista.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20081023.011646.51867355.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <200810232206.50973.bzolnier@gmail.com> <4900F8DE.4070203@ru.mvista.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: KMail/1.9.10
On Friday 24 October 2008, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
> 
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
> 
> >>> From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
> >>> Subject: [PATCH] TXx9: Add TX4938 ATA support (v3)
> >>>       
> >>> Add a helper routine to register tx4938ide driver and use it on
> >>> RBTX4938 board.
> >>>       
> >>> Signed-off-by: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
> >>>       
> >>     The patch already had my
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>
> >>     
> >
> > applied
> >   
> 
>    Hm, I thought that one was for Ralf...

Ralf ACK-ed the change and was fine with it going through ide tree.

Anyway it really doesn't matter through whose tree such patches are
going in as long as people are fine with them.

No need to add some more rigid kernel bureaucracy...

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>