| To: | David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 11/37] Cavium OCTEON: ebase isn't just CAC_BASE |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 24 Oct 2008 20:56:52 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Tomaso Paoletti <tpaoletti@caviumnetworks.com> |
| In-reply-to: | <1224809821-5532-12-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1224809821-5532-1-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> <1224809821-5532-12-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Alpine 1.10 (LFD 962 2008-03-14) |
On Thu, 23 Oct 2008, ddaney@caviumnetworks.com wrote: > From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com> > > On Cavium, the ebase isn't just CAC_BASE, but also the part of > read_c0_ebase() too. How is that unique to CONFIG_CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON? That's a general feature of the MIPS revision 2 architecture, so please make it right from the beginning. You'll avoid an ugly #ifdef this way too. Maciej |
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] rb532: set gpio interrupt status and level for CompactFlash, Florian Fainelli |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 29/37] Don't clobber spinlocks in 8250., Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | [PATCH 11/37] Cavium OCTEON: ebase isn't just CAC_BASE, ddaney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 11/37] Cavium OCTEON: ebase isn't just CAC_BASE, David Daney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |