linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

[PATCH 29/37] Don't clobber spinlocks in 8250.

To: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Subject: [PATCH 29/37] Don't clobber spinlocks in 8250.
From: ddaney@caviumnetworks.com
Date: Thu, 23 Oct 2008 17:56:53 -0700
Cc: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>, Tomaso Paoletti <tpaoletti@caviumnetworks.com>
In-reply-to: <1224809821-5532-1-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <1224809821-5532-1-git-send-email-ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
From: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>

In serial8250_isa_init_ports(), the port's lock is initialized.  We
should not overwrite it.  Only copy in the fields we need.

Signed-off-by: David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: Tomaso Paoletti <tpaoletti@caviumnetworks.com>
---
 drivers/serial/8250.c |   15 +++++++++++++--
 1 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/serial/8250.c b/drivers/serial/8250.c
index 1528de2..d339ac1 100644
--- a/drivers/serial/8250.c
+++ b/drivers/serial/8250.c
@@ -2706,12 +2706,23 @@ static struct uart_driver serial8250_reg = {
  */
 int __init early_serial_setup(struct uart_port *port)
 {
+       struct uart_port *p;
+
        if (port->line >= ARRAY_SIZE(serial8250_ports))
                return -ENODEV;
 
        serial8250_isa_init_ports();
-       serial8250_ports[port->line].port       = *port;
-       serial8250_ports[port->line].port.ops   = &serial8250_pops;
+       p = &serial8250_ports[port->line].port;
+       p->iobase       = port->iobase;
+       p->membase      = port->membase;
+       p->irq          = port->irq;
+       p->uartclk      = port->uartclk;
+       p->fifosize     = port->fifosize;
+       p->regshift     = port->regshift;
+       p->iotype       = port->iotype;
+       p->flags        = port->flags;
+       p->mapbase      = port->mapbase;
+       p->private_data = port->private_data;
        return 0;
 }
 
-- 
1.5.5.1


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>