linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Have ever checked in your mips sparsemem code into mips-linux tree?

To: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>
Subject: Re: Have ever checked in your mips sparsemem code into mips-linux tree?
From: C Michael Sundius <Michael.sundius@sciatl.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2008 13:15:44 -0700
Authentication-results: sj-dkim-4; header.From=Michael.sundius@sciatl.com; dkim=neutral
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, me94043@yahoo.com, "VomLehn, David" <dvomlehn@cisco.com>
In-reply-to: <20080826090936.GC29207@brain>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <48A4AC39.7020707@sciatl.com> <1218753308.23641.56.camel@nimitz> <48A4C542.5000308@sciatl.com> <20080826090936.GC29207@brain>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080501)
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
John wrote:


Hi Michael,

After I read this link, noticed that you have the following patch, but when I 
check up the mips-linux, the patch is not there.

I wonder if you could explain to me a little bit?

Thank you!

John
P.S.: I also worked at SciAtl a few years ago in IPTV division.
John,

I *think* I got tentative signoff from Dave and Any below as per the copied snipits below. I made the modifications that they suggested. please see the attached for two patches:
a) the code
b) the sparsemem.txt doc

not sure if the mips powers that be were ok w/ it. pardon my ignorance, not sure if I am required to do anymore. There was some comment to try this out w/ the CONFIG_SPARSEMEM_VMEMMAP which I believe should "just work", but we've never tried it as of yet, so by my rule I can't
say it is so.. (has anyone tried that?)

Mike

====================================================


Dave Hansen wrote:

Looks great to me.  I can't test it, of course, but I don't see any
problems with it.

Signed-off-by: Dave Hansen <dave@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

-- Dave


Andy Whitcroft wrote:


Otherwise it looks good to me.  I see from the rest of the thread that
there is some discussion over the sizes of these, with that sorted.

Acked-by: Andy Whitcroft <apw@shadowen.org>

-apw
adding patch 1 containing code only:





- - - - - Cisco - - - - - This e-mail and any attachments may contain information which is confidential, proprietary, privileged or otherwise protected by law. The information is solely intended for the named addressee (or a person responsible for delivering it to the addressee). If you are not the intended recipient of this message, you are not authorized to read, print, retain, copy or disseminate this message or any part of it. If you have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately by return e-mail and delete it from your computer.




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>