| To: | "'linux-mips@linux-mips.org'" <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | AW: Same mipsel binary für 2.4 and 2.6 kernel possible? |
| From: | Klatt Uwe <U.Klatt@miwe.de> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Sep 2008 15:40:04 +0200 |
| Accept-language: | de-DE |
| Acceptlanguage: | de-DE |
| In-reply-to: | <48D3A909.6020604@paralogos.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| Thread-index: | AckaW08UtGiq7IteSrGDeEO/xzh0owAABk4A |
| Thread-topic: | Same mipsel binary für 2.4 and 2.6 kernel possible? |
Hello everybody, > I think it's more likely that you've got a problem > with libraries and/or build procedures > for the application. You are right! It's a problem with shared libs. When I link static everything works now. Thank you for your patience. Bye Uwe |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Same mipsel binary für 2.4 and 2.6 kernel possible?, Kevin D. Kissell |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] MIPS checksum fix, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Same mipsel binary für 2.4 and 2.6 kernel possible?, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Next by Thread: | AW: Same mipsel binary für 2.4 and 2.6 kernel possible?, Klatt Uwe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |