linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] MIPS checksum fix

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] MIPS checksum fix
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2008 14:07:52 +0200
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, u1@terran.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
In-reply-to: <20080919114743.GA19359@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.55.0809171104290.17103@cliff.in.clinika.pl> <20080917.222350.41199051.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0809171501450.17103@cliff.in.clinika.pl> <20080918.002705.78730226.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0809171917580.17103@cliff.in.clinika.pl> <20080918220734.GA19222@linux-mips.org> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0809190112090.22686@cliff.in.clinika.pl> <20080919112304.GB13440@linux-mips.org> <20080919114743.GA19359@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 01:47:43PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote:

> I'm interested in test reports of this on all sorts of configurations -
> 32-bit, 64-bit, big / little endian, R2 processors and pre-R2.  In
> particular Cavium being the only MIPS64 R2 implementation would be
> interesting.  This definately is stuff which should go upstream for 2.6.27.

There was a trivial bug in the R2 code.

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>