| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: MIPS checksum bug |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Fri, 19 Sep 2008 11:12:22 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, u1@terran.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20080918220734.GA19222@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.55.0809171104290.17103@cliff.in.clinika.pl> <20080917.222350.41199051.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0809171501450.17103@cliff.in.clinika.pl> <20080918.002705.78730226.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0809171917580.17103@cliff.in.clinika.pl> <20080918220734.GA19222@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008, Ralf Baechle wrote: > Which is a truely weird operation - but MIPS R2 happens to have a wonderful > instruction for this operation, WSBH / DSBH. Ah, finally a justification for the R2 ISA! Seriously though, I smell a caller somewhere fails to call csum_fold() on the result obtained from csum_partial() where it should, so it would be good to fix the bug rather than trying to cover it. Bryan, would you be able to track down the caller? I can see you have done the microoptimisation I had in mind meanwhile -- thanks for saving me the effort. ;) There is a delay slot to fill left though -- will you take care of it too? Maciej |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [SPAM] Same mipsel binary für 2.4 and 2.6 kernel possible?, Markus Gothe |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: mmap is broken for MIPS64 n32 and o32 abis, Sergei Shtylyov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: MIPS checksum bug, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS checksum bug, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |