Re: [PATCH 1/2] ide: Add tx4939ide driver

[Sergei Shtylyov <sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com>]

Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> > > > > +               /*
> > > > > +                * If only one of XFERINT and HOST was asserted, mask
> > > > > +                * this interrupt and wait for an another one.  Note
> > > >  This comment somewhat contradicts the code which returns 1 if only 
> > > > HOST interupt is asserted if ERR is set.
> >    Which is not its business to test. I think you should remove that above 
> > check -- if there's INTRQ asserted, then it's asserted. I wonder if BMIDE 
> > interrupt bit gets set in that case (suspecting it's not)...
> Well, let me explain a bit.  The datasheed say I should wait _both_
> XFERINT and HOST interrupt.  So, if only one of them was asserted, I
> mask it and wait another one.  But on the error case, only HOST was
> asserted and XFERINT was never asserted.  Then I could not exit from
> "waiting another one" state, until timeout.
   Hmm, I got it: you decide whether it's worth waiting more for XFEREND 
interrupt based on whether ERR is set or not. I suppose IDE_INT doesn't get 
set in case the command gets endede with ERR set?
MBR, Sergei