| To: | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t |
| From: | Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@goop.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 11 Sep 2008 09:06:18 -0700 |
| Cc: | Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>, Alex Nixon <alex.nixon@citrix.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809111202560.1545@anakin> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <48C8D76B.10901@goop.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0809111202560.1545@anakin> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080723) |
Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> PowerPC also defines a phys_addr_t with the same meaning as x86; the
>> powerpc arch maintainers are happy with these patches.
>>
>
> If I'm not mistaking, this is also true for some MIPS machines.
>
Nothing turns up in a grep over arch/mips and include/asm-mips.
J
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] rb532: do not use phys_t, Florian Fainelli |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] rb532: do not use phys_t, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH 0/3] Globally defining phys_addr_t, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |