| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: looking for help interpreting softlockup/stack trace |
| From: | "Chris Friesen" <cfriesen@nortel.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:35:58 -0600 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20080805191618.GB8629@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <48989AFE.5000500@nortel.com> <20080805191618.GB8629@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0.2-6 (X11/20050513) |
Ralf Baechle wrote: $LBB378 is an internal symbol. The value of RA may not be very informative if it was overwritten by a random subroutine call. What determines which function names get compiled into the object file, and which ones get these numerical symbols? You may also try lockdep; it gives much more detailed information though it's more heavyweight. I would love to be able to use lockdep...however I'm stuck on an old kernel. Chris |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] vr41xx: fix problem with vr41xx_cpu_wait, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: looking for help interpreting softlockup/stack trace, David Daney |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: looking for help interpreting softlockup/stack trace, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: looking for help interpreting softlockup/stack trace, David Daney |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |