| To: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] vr41xx: fix problem with vr41xx_cpu_wait |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 6 Aug 2008 18:15:31 +0100 |
| Cc: | ricmm@gentoo.org, yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20080807.021057.59650770.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <200808060440.m764eF9I021783@po-mbox303.hop.2iij.net> <20080806.223033.128619389.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20080806161710.GA22957@woodpecker.gentoo.org> <20080807.021057.59650770.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Aug 07, 2008 at 02:10:57AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote: > http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2007-11/msg00123.html > > To support vr41's standby instruction in same way, we might have to > synthesise rollback_handle_int, etc. or r4k_wait at runtime... The infrastructure for that is now there :-) Another question of course is if that stuff really deserve this ultimate degree of optimization. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] vr41xx: fix problem with vr41xx_cpu_wait, Atsushi Nemoto |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: looking for help interpreting softlockup/stack trace, Chris Friesen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] vr41xx: fix problem with vr41xx_cpu_wait, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] vr41xx: fix problem with vr41xx_cpu_wait, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |