| To: | geert@linux-m68k.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [patch 29/29] initrd: Fix virtual/physical mix-up in overwrite test |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Sat, 26 Jul 2008 01:27:31 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | ralf@linux-mips.org, torvalds@linux-foundation.org, akpm@linux-foundation.org, linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, linux-arch@vger.kernel.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807242032430.701@anakin> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20080717191758.556975996@mail.of.borg> <20080725.003526.39154055.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.64.0807242032430.701@anakin> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008 20:49:27 +0200 (CEST), Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Because an argument of mips virt_to_phys() is an pointer and > > initrd_start is unsigned long. It seems most (all?) arch's > > virt_to_phys() casts its argument to unsigned long internally. Should > > mips follow? > > Alternatively, as initrd_start is really a virtual kernel address, > perhaps it should be changed from unsigned long to void * instead? > > It's cast to `void *' in several place. arch/xtensa/kernel/setup.c even > has `extern void *initrd_start' to fool around this? I agree it would make code cleaner, but the conversion might be somewhat hard. If we converted initrd_start (and initrd_end) to void *, we should also convert INITRD_START, free_initrd_mem(), some other arch specific local/global variables and printk format strings. Also code like "initrd_start & PAGE_MASK" should be changed too... Is it worth to do? --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Is the new generic KGDB patch in upstream-akpm?, Daniel Laird |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH][MIPS] update cobalt_defconfig, Yoichi Yuasa |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [patch 29/29] initrd: Fix virtual/physical mix-up in overwrite test, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [patch 29/29] initrd: Fix virtual/physical mix-up in overwrite test, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |