| To: | Martin Gebert <martin.gebert@alpha-bit.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: HOWTO submit patches using WebMail - Help appreciated? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:15:02 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <4880AD07.2070509@alpha-bit.de> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <64660ef00807171259l55f85380l47cfdc7574f84099@mail.gmail.com> <200807181528.41119.brian.foster@innova-card.com> <20080718143913.GB25491@linux-mips.org> <4880AD07.2070509@alpha-bit.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 04:47:35PM +0200, Martin Gebert wrote: >> I'd like to remind people of the wiki page on this topic at >> >> http://www.linux-mips.org/wiki/Mailing-patches >> >> It's not been updated in a while and doesn't cover all clients or >> possible solutions so feel free to update it. >> > Which brings me to a question I've been wondering for some days now: Is > the [PATCH] prefix in the subject mandatory for a patch proposal being > noticed by the maintainers? That's simply a question of working style and mail volume of the maintainer. In the past I used to miss patches that were not sent to me directly at times. I solved that by filtering for patches using procmail. But that scheme also has its shortcomings; it would miss patches being sent in too creative MIME encodings but people aren't supposed to do that anyway. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] au1xmmc: suspend/resume implementation, Pierre Ossman |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] sparse: Make pre_buffer dynamically increasable, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: HOWTO submit patches using WebMail - Help appreciated?, Martin Gebert |
| Next by Thread: | Re: HOWTO submit patches using WebMail - Help appreciated?, Martin Gebert |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |