| To: | Manuel Lauss <mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: 2.6.26-gitX: insane number of section headers |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 16 Jul 2008 12:08:48 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20080716110357.GA5093@roarinelk.homelinux.net> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20080716075246.GA3184@roarinelk.homelinux.net> <20080716081532.GB3184@roarinelk.homelinux.net> <20080716105927.GA8206@linux-mips.org> <20080716110357.GA5093@roarinelk.homelinux.net> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 01:03:57PM +0200, Manuel Lauss wrote: > > I consider that an experimental commit. It's meant to solve the problems > > we're having on a few very large compilation units with the limited length > > of branches. But if the cure turns out to be worse than the illness I'm > > ready to pull it again. > > If it fixes bugs for people, then by all means leave it in. I was just > curious because my self-written bootloader complained about it. I wonder why your bootloader cares about sections. Normally a bootloader only ever should think about segments and the number of segments the sections are getting mapped to should be unchanged by my patch. > Thanks for the explanation. Immer doch :-) Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: 2.6.26-gitX: insane number of section headers, Manuel Lauss |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: 2.6.26-gitX: insane number of section headers, Manuel Lauss |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: 2.6.26-gitX: insane number of section headers, Manuel Lauss |
| Next by Thread: | Re: 2.6.26-gitX: insane number of section headers, Manuel Lauss |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |