linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Bug in atomic_sub_if_positive

To: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: Bug in atomic_sub_if_positive
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Jul 2008 12:54:27 +0100
Cc: ths@networkno.de, mlarsen@broadcom.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20080704.000426.39153587.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20080702095955.GA7007@networkno.de> <20080702.193133.211490377.nemoto@toshiba-tops.co.jp> <20080702105155.GC7007@networkno.de> <20080704.000426.39153587.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Fri, Jul 04, 2008 at 12:04:26AM +0900, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:

> On Wed, 2 Jul 2008 11:51:55 +0100, Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> wrote:
> > > The patch looks correct.
> > 
> > Agreed.
> 
> Ralf, too late for 2.6.26?

Pull request to Linus is out.

> Anyway I think it should go into -stable tree too.

It is.  This one is important.  Heck, I don't get how a kernel can be as
reliable as it was with an elefant like this :-)

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>