| To: | binutils@sourceware.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS |
| From: | Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 01 Jul 2008 23:02:59 +0100 |
| Cc: | gcc@gcc.gnu.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:mail-followup-to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent :mime-version:content-type; bh=QmXN6RhKS0/S1/XTXrOP6Zl+KiStHwWJlFhVEynpZ5w=; b=a5s8+RTGjm9dn1e4VxtQEJmGh/1dVKndynHMOrj8DVtPfPyfuikIZODnq64UzVF1as zL7zTqjbVjfmnl0XORGxoRMHnzwzDIYCI+BdKbcYfkVU/Us6f2d1G6wtkoWE/UbAS+T2 Xl8TfSQ3fN1xr3towMcXzyNIuvcwtBLe3Dt8Y= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:mail-followup-to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=YZbKp/A7koACVvpypMHopcBP0rV3g5B4iXX1nJV1IWed4Ss4A3Rte32Ob/1RP0Zupa DbpM+0UjAYw9BO6T3ZjUfFeEny9AYkpG8jLTSco1Ap9JrB0VntlshYNZZ7wZ3pst72rI kCTMQiM92ZmA+6pY3a23hk5DwzV6O4WlulvsY= |
| In-reply-to: | <87zlp149ot.fsf@firetop.home> (Richard Sandiford's message of "Tue\, 01 Jul 2008 21\:43\:30 +0100") |
| Mail-followup-to: | binutils@sourceware.org,gcc@gcc.gnu.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, rdsandiford@googlemail.com |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <87y74pxwyl.fsf@firetop.home> <20080701202236.GA1534@caradoc.them.org> <87zlp149ot.fsf@firetop.home> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.1 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com> writes: > I've been thinking about that a lot recently, since I heard about > your implementation. I kind-of guessed it had been agreed with MTI > beforehand (although I hadn't realised MTI themselves had written > the specification). Having thought it over, I think it would be best > if I stand down as a MIPS maintainer and if someone with the appropriate > commercial connections is appointed instead. I'd recommend any > combination of yourself, Adam Nemet and David Daney (subject to > said people being willing, of course). I realised afterwards that this might be offensive by who it left out. For the record, it wasn't supposed to be an exclusive list. Other people have strong claims too. ;) Richard |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS, Richard Sandiford |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: Bug in atomic_sub_if_positive, Morten Larsen |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS, Richard Sandiford |
| Next by Thread: | Re: RFC: Adding non-PIC executable support to MIPS, Adam Nemet |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |