linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Bug in atomic_sub_if_positive

To: "Ralf Baechle" <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: RE: Bug in atomic_sub_if_positive
From: "Morten Larsen" <mlarsen@broadcom.com>
Date: Thu, 26 Jun 2008 23:00:01 -0700
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20080626121120.GA5222@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
Thread-index: AcjXhfSPlphHxEPJS56jk+LneGLzBQAlDgzw
Thread-topic: Bug in atomic_sub_if_positive
 
> I did play with a test program and can't reproduce the effect with my
> assembler.  I have darm memories of gas immitating some 
> obscure behaviour
> of the IRIX assembler and I think it doesn't do so for all 
> MIPS targets.
> 
> So I'm wandering what toolchain have you been using?
> 
>   Ralf
> 
The toolchain is from Wind River Systems 2.0 Linux Edition.
The kernel (based on 2.6.21.7) is also supplied by Wind River, and it
has preemption turned on.
The CPU is a Broadcom/SiByte BCM1125H (single core version of BCM1250
Swarm.)

Morten


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>