linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH 2/8] Alchemy: register mmc platform device for db1200/pb1200

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] Alchemy: register mmc platform device for db1200/pb1200 boards.
From: Manuel Lauss <mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2008 15:58:10 +0200
Cc: Pierre Ossman <drzeus@drzeus.cx>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, sshtylyov@ru.mvista.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
In-reply-to: <20080612134729.GA20015@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20080609063521.GA8724@roarinelk.homelinux.net> <20080609063702.GC8724@roarinelk.homelinux.net> <20080612090206.GB21601@linux-mips.org> <20080612101839.GC21601@linux-mips.org> <20080612121828.GA24603@roarinelk.homelinux.net> <20080612122646.GA9493@linux-mips.org> <20080612154248.5c9c5c9d@mjolnir.drzeus.cx> <20080612134729.GA20015@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09)
On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 02:47:30PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 12, 2008 at 03:42:48PM +0200, Pierre Ossman wrote:
> 
> > > Pierre, feel free to merge these MIPS bits into your tree.  The whole
> > > series should probably go upstream together.
> > > 
> > 
> > How's the dependency issue though? Will this series be bisectable in my
> > tree?
> 
> If we're only talking about a build, there should be no dependencies
> between the Alchemy and the MMC parts of the series.  The Alchemy part
> sorts the device registration and that's a separate construction site
> from the rest.  Of course with only one applied things won't work
> terribly well but that would only be temporarily.

FWIW, I build tested-tested the DB1200 defconfig after each patch applied.
As Ralf said, patch 1 alone isn't terribly useful on it, but it should work.

        Manuel Lauss

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>