linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Changing the treatment of the MIPS HI and LO registers

To: Richard Sandiford <rdsandiford@googlemail.com>
Subject: Re: Changing the treatment of the MIPS HI and LO registers
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Jun 2008 22:54:01 +0100 (BST)
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <87zlpuxqfb.fsf@firetop.home>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <87tzgj4nh6.fsf@firetop.home> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0805272134540.18833@cliff.in.clinika.pl> <87abib4d9t.fsf@firetop.home> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0805272357020.18833@cliff.in.clinika.pl> <87r6bm1ebd.fsf@firetop.home> <Pine.LNX.4.55.0805290213140.29522@cliff.in.clinika.pl> <878wxtvarg.fsf@firetop.home> <8763stz2p3.fsf@firetop.home> <87zlpuxqfb.fsf@firetop.home>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Mon, 9 Jun 2008, Richard Sandiford wrote:

> Please shout if you find anything wrong with either the patch or
> the documentation changes.

 Lacking the time to review your changes or at least test at the run time
(sorry!) I trust you have done a decent job as usually.  Perhaps someone
else can to that.  Otherwise the results will come back and haunt you in
some two years or suchlike when people start using this version of GCC to
build the kernel. ;)

 To give you an indicator -- I am still using 4.1.2 and will keep doing so
for another year or so.  I may skip a version or two when I finally decide
to upgrade though.

  Maciej

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>