linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: linux-next: Tree for June 6 (fwd)

To: Linux/MIPS Development <linux-mips@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 6 (fwd)
From: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Date: Sun, 8 Jun 2008 10:38:54 +0200 (CEST)
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
FYI...

---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Fri, 6 Jun 2008 21:11:51 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for June 6

Hi Dmitri,

On Fri, 06 Jun 2008 11:48:37 +0300 Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@movial.fi> 
wrote:
>
> Please see http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/4/152 where you'll find the
> description of how I built a MIPS cross-toolchain and a working MIPS config.

Thanks for that.  Sorry I didn't respond sooner.

We have managed to make a working tool chain and I will
add some MIPS builds soon.  Was the attached config just the
malta_defconfig in the kernel tree, or there something special about it.
I noticed that a straight defconfig build works for mips and mipsel.
Would you expect all{no,mod}config to work?  What would be a good 64 bit
test config?

It is easier for us if we just use the configs out of the kernel tree,
but others are possible (its just harder to keep them up to date).

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@canb.auug.org.au
http://www.canb.auug.org.au/~sfr/

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • Re: linux-next: Tree for June 6 (fwd), Geert Uytterhoeven <=