| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH RESEND] [MIPS]: multi-statement if() seems to be missing braces |
| From: | Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 13 May 2008 18:02:25 -0700 |
| Cc: | Ilpo Järvinen <ilpo.jarvinen@helsinki.fi>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20080513232507.GA24102@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64.0805131444360.15369@wrl-59.cs.helsinki.fi> <20080513232507.GA24102@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Wed, 14 May 2008 00:25:07 +0100 Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> wrote: > On Tue, May 13, 2008 at 02:50:50PM +0300, Ilpo J__rvinen wrote: > > > In case this is a genuine bug, somebody else more familiar > > with that stuff should evaluate it's effects (I just found it > > by some shell pipeline and it seems suspicious looking). > > Should be fairly as proven by practice; it's there since day of of 64-bit > pagetable for 32-bit hw support which was November 29, 2004. > It's unlikely that anyone would notice an error in pte_mkyoung(). It will affect page reclaim behaviour and _might_ be demonstrable with a carefully set up test. But an error in here won't cause crashes or lockups or anything. What this needs is someone who understands the architecture (ie: you ;)) to take a look, please. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH]: cpmac bugfixes and enhancements, Matteo Croce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH 6/6] RTC: Trivially probe for an M41T80 (#2), Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH RESEND] [MIPS]: multi-statement if() seems to be missing braces, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH RESEND] [MIPS]: multi-statement if() seems to be missing braces, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |