| To: | Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH][MIPS][3/6]: AR7: VLYNQ bus |
| From: | Matteo Croce <technoboy85@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 2 Apr 2008 15:57:08 +0200 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, Eugene Konev <ejka@imfi.kspu.ru>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <20080329095914.GA18263@paradigm.rfc822.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <200803120221.25044.technoboy85@gmail.com> <200803120226.42795.technoboy85@gmail.com> <20080329095914.GA18263@paradigm.rfc822.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | KMail/1.9.9 |
Il Saturday 29 March 2008 10:59:14 Florian Lohoff ha scritto: > What i found in the TI code is that FIRST the local->control needs to > get set before issueing a remote access so shouldnd the > > vlynq_reg_write(dev->remote ... ) > > move behind the dev->local ? I mean the logic is to set a local clock > divisor - try to access something on the remote end and see if the link > got up ?!? > > Flo dunno about the order, maybe "vlynq_reg_write(dev->remote->control, 0);" and other NULL writes works as a reset... |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH][MIPS][3/6]: AR7: VLYNQ bus, Matteo Croce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH][MIPS][3/6]: AR7: VLYNQ bus, Matteo Croce |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][MIPS][3/6]: AR7: VLYNQ bus, Florian Lohoff |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH][MIPS][3/6]: AR7: VLYNQ bus, Matteo Croce |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |