| To: | Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] IP28: fix MC GIOPAR setting |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 1 Apr 2008 16:36:55 +0100 |
| Cc: | peter fuerst <post@pfrst.de>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20080321213233.GA10546@alpha.franken.de> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.58.0803211535570.423@Indigo2.Peter> <20080321194737.GA8398@alpha.franken.de> <Pine.LNX.4.58.0803212125050.523@Indigo2.Peter> <20080321213233.GA10546@alpha.franken.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) |
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 10:32:33PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > > Would indeed be most surprising, if this isn't appropriate for any Indigo2- > > Impact, but don't know for sure. And can't check, whether it at least > > doesn't > > hurt Non-Impact Indigo2. Of course, being able to avoid '#ifdef' at all > > would > > be the prettiest alternative. > > I'll check my IP22 machines, if they are ok with that change. Another > solution could be to have gio_set_master() similair to pci_set_master(). > That way we only enable master, if it is requested by a driver. That sounds like a clean solution. Anyway where are we standing with this? I assume it's release critical for IP28? Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Fix xss1500 compilation, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Fix xss1500 compilation, Adrian Bunk |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [2.6 patch] mips: remove MIPS_XXS1500, Florian Fainelli |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] IP28: fix MC GIOPAR setting, Markus Gothe |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |