| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Compiler error? [was: Re: new kernel oops in recent kernels] |
| From: | tsbogend@alpha.franken.de (Thomas Bogendoerfer) |
| Date: | Mon, 17 Mar 2008 15:32:15 +0100 |
| Cc: | Giuseppe Sacco <giuseppe@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20080317141828.GA25798@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <1205664563.3050.4.camel@localhost> <1205699257.4159.14.camel@casa> <20080316233619.GA29511@alpha.franken.de> <1205741142.3515.2.camel@localhost> <20080317141828.GA25798@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 02:18:28PM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 09:05:42AM +0100, Giuseppe Sacco wrote: > > > The patch you proposed, that use a larger buffer, does not seems to > > trigger the bug. > > It may help but doesn't have a chance to be accepted upstream. So > this is no more than an useful litmus test. sure, that's why I called it a hack. It was just to make sure, that I'm on the right track. Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Compiler error? [was: Re: new kernel oops in recent kernels], Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH 2/2][MIPS] add irq_disable_hazard() before c0_compare_int_pending(), Yoichi Yuasa |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Compiler error? [was: Re: new kernel oops in recent kernels], Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Compiler error? [was: Re: new kernel oops in recent kernels], Thomas Bogendoerfer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |