| To: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | MIPS section alignment of object file |
| From: | "robert song" <robertsong.linux@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:12:01 +0900 |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=OO/uF/F6vkxJkQS054UZlkloaCcHwBT6Cp5oJcpeoLk=; b=L23PXU12b2eZ+oSZIzmsl8BE01WevCCeHlTDsQzv1giyXDIzY0cpfxQr4jiYwba48YRGbJWutLBLQx0eIhGfT/h9/Kcc56lWwUT1h+/HmiY2ZKAT4spu9EgUKPLSnKFhFMnfsti89FsKS+ZGJuGCa57ECfhbb5xTBOsAqksWkVY= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=XaSTXHZV7/xwKJLmvBzRl/1hyRdCpXdbl5PFyhBUY/HXZADjdbjYeEHVXEQ92MmI2XMcs9GeQSrjPZW5lWG8nD62GRrqOyvLXMc77bIA3OMnFlsPaLWGlMkNd0AiILmHJvui4XKaXm802yvXXXFGq1WcivuzIp5S7AQG9+cJh+E= |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Hello, everyone.
some sections like .data are set to 16 bytes alignment in the
binutils/gas/config/tc-mips.c as bellows.
(void) bfd_set_section_alignment (stdoutput, text_section, 4);
But in other architectures like arm, .data section is aligned to 4
bytes alignment,
and now I test the object file generated by gas, and found that the
size of .data section sometimes is a little bigger than the situation
of 4 bytes alignments because of the amount of padding.
There are some comments in the tc-mips.c as bellows:
On a native system other than VxWorks, sections must be aligned
to 16 byte boundaries. When configured for an embedded ELF
target, we don't bother.
I want to know whether some mips architecture requires that the
sections of elf object file specifies to be aligned to 16 bytes, or
else 16-bytes alignment will get a good performance than other
alignments just like 4 bytes????
I recompiled the binutils by changing the alignment to 4 bytes, and
compiled some
test files, and ran on my mips target(TX4937). There is no problem.
I am really puzzled and any help will be appreciated.
robertsong
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Tickless feature of 2.6.24 kernel on MIPS ?, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | kdb patches?!, Anirban Sinha |
| Previous by Thread: | Gettting USB host to work on AU1100, Nico Coesel |
| Next by Thread: | Re: MIPS section alignment of object file, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |