| To: | Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: Tester with IP27/IP30 needed |
| From: | Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 22 Jan 2008 10:20:06 -0500 |
| Cc: | Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org, debian-mips@lists.debian.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20080117004054.GA12051@alpha.franken.de> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20080115112420.GA7347@alpha.franken.de> <20080115112719.GB7920@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20080117004054.GA12051@alpha.franken.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.9 (Windows/20071031) |
Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:27:19PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:Simple testcase for me is: [snip] No effect on Octane R14000A, as far as lockups. Spikes the CPU usage in 'ps aux', but that's about it. If I can get my plucky IP32 R10K to boot again soon, I may try it there for kicks and giggles. Maybe we're also seeing a side effect of the R10K's spec exec knocking the non-cache-coherent machines out? Also, tried building the code with the R10K cache barrier on to see if anything else changes? Generally reserved for kernel stuff, but Peter once speculated userland might have a use for it. --Kumba -- Gentoo/MIPS Team Lead "Such is oft the course of deeds that move the wheels of the world: small hands do them because they must, while the eyes of the great are elsewhere." --Elrond |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | (no subject), Thiemo Seufer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: Tester with IP27/IP30 needed, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: Tester with IP27/IP30 needed, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: Tester with IP27/IP30 needed, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |