linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Tester with IP27/IP30 needed

To: Florian Lohoff <flo@rfc822.org>
Subject: Re: Tester with IP27/IP30 needed
From: tsbogend@alpha.franken.de (Thomas Bogendoerfer)
Date: Thu, 17 Jan 2008 11:00:34 +0100
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org, debian-mips@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <20080117082741.GA2586@paradigm.rfc822.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20080115112420.GA7347@alpha.franken.de> <20080115112719.GB7920@paradigm.rfc822.org> <20080117004054.GA12051@alpha.franken.de> <20080117082741.GA2586@paradigm.rfc822.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 09:27:41AM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 01:40:54AM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 15, 2008 at 12:27:19PM +0100, Florian Lohoff wrote:
> > > Simple testcase for me is:
> > 
> > this kills my IP28 after a few seconds. If I drop rdhwr or sync the
> > machine hasn't locked up after running for several minutes. Looks
> > like we are hiting a strange condition.
> > 
> > This sort of code could be found in glibc 2.7 all over the place...
> > 
> > Thomas.
> > 
> > PS: Using rdhwr_noopt doesn't make a difference...
> 
> Kills my ip28 after 2 seconds ...

I checked the ErrorEPC and it's pointing right after the sc. This
is consistent to the dump Ralf did on his IP27.

Thomas.

-- 
Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a
good idea.                                                [ RFC1925, 2.3 ]

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>