| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] prom_free_prom_memory for QEMU |
| From: | Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:43:12 +0300 |
| Cc: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2e99OBW1rxbsmbMIHmdBtU1ewWepXFi+pN+bMzbMa2M=; b=VUPL8XVunRvmMb9VownTtURwYi2hDuerPoCS7OwPpeD1HKWFYzJA4Aa4hbu3PVYNQ+1hO5zVA3kYSobhTLVJfv8ea49CTtwJjTaS6y/ogRNKwSIMH3pt5tnBse/qAmh5PIOXeRpdVZLUEGlH5f4LZnlF5Y9vkHc/pc1qJKWvEH4= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XZFsZ6uJXbmLqvp/LWE+VVAU7S0cVXzpDn0lp50vvcNR3Wz/60VQOwrfqSVVqpsIhN5o4HaUgibijz9XFwapUjFTKE/oNFQ6xBdb8rfHW/FU6qzgqvKujBnz0EBUbcjGGs5u/72I9sMIPIkxg1fLjBdtHNEYnJ5uoAbv00TlXpc= |
| In-reply-to: | <20080114141424.GB22344@linux-mips.org> |
| Organization: | DmVo Home |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20080114.212253.126142719.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20080114133701.GA16555@linux-mips.org> <478B6AA3.2070402@gmail.com> <20080114141424.GB22344@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071022) |
Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:58:59PM +0300, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote: > >>> I was actually planning to remove the Qemu platform for 2.6.25. The >>> Malta emulation has become so good that there is no more point in having >>> the underfeatured synthetic platform that CONFIG_QEMU is. >> I wholeheartedly agree with that. It is a godsend to me that I can use >> identical configs to build the kernels for QEMU and for a physical Malta. >> Emulation is more convenient to me because QEMU boots and runs faster >> than the board I'm working with. Many thanks for that to QEMU developers. >> >> Off the topic, how about the plans to remove Atlas support? > > Maciej is promising to fix it up since a few years ;-) Aside of that it's > safe to say the Atlas is dead like a coffin nail. Well, I could do the proper cleanup, if you give your sayso. As I wrote here yesterday, I noticed that Malta code was screaming for being put into proper shape. If MIPS maintainers are interested in applying such janitorial patches, I could simultaneously wipe the Atlas support off. So? > > The main problem with the Atlas is the SAA9730 SOC which is broken in an > infinite number of totally pervert ways, I'm told. I know of no systems > other than the Atlas using it. > > Ralf > |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | memory related kernel bug on cobalt raq2, Noah Meyerhans |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] prom_free_prom_memory for QEMU, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] prom_free_prom_memory for QEMU, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] prom_free_prom_memory for QEMU, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |