linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] prom_free_prom_memory for QEMU

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] prom_free_prom_memory for QEMU
From: Dmitri Vorobiev <dmitri.vorobiev@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2008 19:43:12 +0300
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2e99OBW1rxbsmbMIHmdBtU1ewWepXFi+pN+bMzbMa2M=; b=VUPL8XVunRvmMb9VownTtURwYi2hDuerPoCS7OwPpeD1HKWFYzJA4Aa4hbu3PVYNQ+1hO5zVA3kYSobhTLVJfv8ea49CTtwJjTaS6y/ogRNKwSIMH3pt5tnBse/qAmh5PIOXeRpdVZLUEGlH5f4LZnlF5Y9vkHc/pc1qJKWvEH4=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:organization:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=XZFsZ6uJXbmLqvp/LWE+VVAU7S0cVXzpDn0lp50vvcNR3Wz/60VQOwrfqSVVqpsIhN5o4HaUgibijz9XFwapUjFTKE/oNFQ6xBdb8rfHW/FU6qzgqvKujBnz0EBUbcjGGs5u/72I9sMIPIkxg1fLjBdtHNEYnJ5uoAbv00TlXpc=
In-reply-to: <20080114141424.GB22344@linux-mips.org>
Organization: DmVo Home
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20080114.212253.126142719.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20080114133701.GA16555@linux-mips.org> <478B6AA3.2070402@gmail.com> <20080114141424.GB22344@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14pre (X11/20071022)
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 04:58:59PM +0300, Dmitri Vorobiev wrote:
> 
>>> I was actually planning to remove the Qemu platform for 2.6.25.  The
>>> Malta emulation has become so good that there is no more point in having
>>> the underfeatured synthetic platform that CONFIG_QEMU is.
>> I wholeheartedly agree with that. It is a godsend to me that I can use
>> identical configs to build the kernels for QEMU and for a physical Malta.
>> Emulation is more convenient to me because QEMU boots and runs faster
>> than the board I'm working with. Many thanks for that to QEMU developers.
>>
>> Off the topic, how about the plans to remove Atlas support?
> 
> Maciej is promising to fix it up since a few years ;-)  Aside of that it's
> safe to say the Atlas is dead like a coffin nail.

Well, I could do the proper cleanup, if you give your sayso. As I wrote here
yesterday, I noticed that Malta code was screaming for being put into proper
shape. If MIPS maintainers are interested in applying such janitorial patches,
I could simultaneously wipe the Atlas support off.

So?

> 
> The main problem with the Atlas is the SAA9730 SOC which is broken in an
> infinite number of totally pervert ways, I'm told.  I know of no systems
> other than the Atlas using it.
> 
>   Ralf
> 


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>