| To: | Chris Friesen <cfriesen@nortel.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: questions on struct sigcontext |
| From: | Daniel Jacobowitz <dan@debian.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 13 Dec 2007 10:36:21 -0500 |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <47607327.5090709@nortel.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <47601DEE.4090200@nortel.com> <20071212190032.GA30506@caradoc.them.org> <47607327.5090709@nortel.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-12-11) |
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 05:47:51PM -0600, Chris Friesen wrote: > If the cause/badvaddr entries in struct sigcontext were filled in by the > exception handler in the kernel, wouldn't the values in that struct be > completely valid even if the registers themselves were changed before > userspace could handle the signal? Yeah, my reply didn't make much sense. Trust Ralf's instead. -- Daniel Jacobowitz CodeSourcery |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Inter processor synchronization, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH][MIPS] kernel build fails if CONFIG_KGDB=y and CONFIG_SMP=n, Frank Rowand |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: questions on struct sigcontext, David Daney |
| Next by Thread: | Inter processor synchronization, Nilanjan Roychowdhury |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |