linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: Cobalt fixes

To: Yoichi Yuasa <yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
Subject: Re: Cobalt fixes
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 11:23:43 +0000
Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <20071212075309.5172da92.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20071211121220.GA10870@linux-mips.org> <20071211235001.8621bdb9.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp> <20071211153522.GB15843@linux-mips.org> <20071212075309.5172da92.yoichi_yuasa@tripeaks.co.jp>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 07:53:09AM +0900, Yoichi Yuasa wrote:

> > > > for non-subscribers.  Linus has reverted the offending patch
> > > > fd6e732186ab522c812ab19c2c5e5befb8ec8115 in question so now the PCI and
> > > > I/O port code needs to be fixed up to be able to handle such a setup.
> > > 
> > > It can be fixed my fix PCI resource patch.
> > > 
> > > http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2007-01/msg00049.html
> > 
> > Modulo a codying style issue that one is the same as the pci.c segment of
> > the patch I've just posted.
> 
> This is a fix proposed before fd6e732186ab522c812ab19c2c5e5befb8ec8115. 
> This patch is still effective. 

Ah, I had already applied the identical patch yesterday.  Thanks anyway!

But it should be considered temporary.  For some configurations there is
no chance for this to work and the patch will probably get in my way for
the planned rewrite of the resource allocation.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>