| To: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SiByte 1480 & Branch Likely instructions? |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:20:27 +0000 (GMT) |
| Cc: | Kaz Kylheku <kaz@zeugmasystems.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20071210153523.GA19384@linux-mips.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <DDFD17CC94A9BD49A82147DDF7D545C5590CF0@exchange.ZeugmaSystems.local> <20071209051450.GA18181@linux-mips.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0712101522100.1177@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20071210153523.GA19384@linux-mips.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Ralf Baechle wrote: > It would devastate the performance of some binaries. I think this is what the deprecation is about. ;-) > As an intellectual challenge, how far can you strip down a MIPS > implementation and emulate removed instructions in the kernel ;-) Well, going back to MIPS I is certainly achievable (OK, we could keep ll/sc for the sake of sanity) and then perhaps a little bit further. After all, all of the ALU ops can be done with the NOR op only. ;-) Maciej |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: SiByte 1480 & Branch Likely instructions?, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] Alchemy: fix PCI resource conflict (take 2), Sergei Shtylyov |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SiByte 1480 & Branch Likely instructions?, Ralf Baechle |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] SNI_RM: EISA support for A20R/RM200, Ralf Baechle |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |