| To: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SGI IP28 support |
| From: | tsbogend@alpha.franken.de (Thomas Bogendoerfer) |
| Date: | Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:01:27 +0100 |
| In-reply-to: | <20071126223814.GA21339@alpha.franken.de> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20071126223814.GA21339@alpha.franken.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11) |
On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 11:38:14PM +0100, Thomas Bogendoerfer wrote: > [..] There is one thing I forgot: You need a special gcc, which will generate cache barriers to avoid speculative stores done by the R10k. Peter had some patches submitted to the gcc maintainers, which I used to build my own gcc 4.2.1 cross compiler. Does anybody know, if Peter's paches are already intergrated in newer gcc versions ? Thomas. -- Crap can work. Given enough thrust pigs will fly, but it's not necessary a good idea. [ RFC1925, 2.3 ] |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [PATCH] SGISEEQ: use cached memory access to make driver work on IP28, Thomas Bogendoerfer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] fix warning when using PHYS_TO_XKSEG_xx(), Andrew Sharp |
| Previous by Thread: | SGI IP28 support, Thomas Bogendoerfer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: SGI IP28 support, post |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |