| To: | ddaney@avtrex.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: WAIT vs. tickless kernel |
| From: | Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> |
| Date: | Wed, 07 Nov 2007 01:02:59 +0900 (JST) |
| Cc: | ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <47308F36.2070200@avtrex.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20071103.014649.122254137.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20071107.003925.74752709.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <47308F36.2070200@avtrex.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 07:58:46 -0800, David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> wrote: > > + .set mips0 > > + /* end of rollback region (the region size must be power of two) */ > > + .set pop > > > > The .set mips0 is redundant as .set pop immediately follows. Oh yes. I'll drop it on next revision. Thanks. --- Atsushi Nemoto |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: WAIT vs. tickless kernel, David Daney |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [PATCH] Fix typo in R3000 TRACE_IRQFLAGS code, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: WAIT vs. tickless kernel, David Daney |
| Next by Thread: | Re: WAIT vs. tickless kernel, Atsushi Nemoto |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |