linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: WAIT vs. tickless kernel

To: ddaney@avtrex.com
Subject: Re: WAIT vs. tickless kernel
From: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 01:02:59 +0900 (JST)
Cc: ralf@linux-mips.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <47308F36.2070200@avtrex.com>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20071103.014649.122254137.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <20071107.003925.74752709.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <47308F36.2070200@avtrex.com>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
On Tue, 06 Nov 2007 07:58:46 -0800, David Daney <ddaney@avtrex.com> wrote:
> > +   .set    mips0
> > +   /* end of rollback region (the region size must be power of two) */
> > +   .set    pop
> >   
> 
> The .set mips0 is redundant as .set pop immediately follows.

Oh yes.  I'll drop it on next revision.  Thanks.

---
Atsushi Nemoto

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>