linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code

To: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code
From: Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2007 08:23:15 +0100
Cc: Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de>, Nigel Stephens <nigel@mips.com>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=rDMlNyVBA0u3aNDtER6noLjjNPF754KVBkFI+hbBRaE=; b=TfxvlBngmFq+/bq9y4yetR4cFf8UcKsavKJhELHqvxN+6fPX/ZVYSunzphFhD9IeNlW6MZny+f461ACKtP1lWVeeHy8IlQ2K8iqa4jFuRaMgMWzp/21lkj11fx32Potfb2Fpw5oOhBonXbPPOzi5Fz/R0wGgVrS7xcW01JFI2N8=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=G9x6AY5NX7f1lHbiGB7hL93Dk0cCs6aeKGonYJnAYWTVVCpDCQaOYuwldHBcTEZVyzYrLnHGg+0CiX610tS1LSJBPWi/nq7pTyTx2laTO11HEySGvYK0Wdl7PiTjBq+Trp8R56V5hoJ9OnFVisAdAcoVPQ7pSCyx8uojaSaYEY8=
In-reply-to: <20071105233025.GB12514@linux-mips.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <47147551.1010004@gmail.com> <4714B58E.8020005@mips.com> <4715C039.7090603@gmail.com> <20071017123046.GY3379@networkno.de> <47160D31.5080201@mips.com> <472D8110.2080506@gmail.com> <20071104174710.GA9363@networkno.de> <472E2955.3000803@gmail.com> <20071105113618.GD27893@linux-mips.org> <472F8C82.4080406@gmail.com> <20071105233025.GB12514@linux-mips.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719)
Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 05, 2007 at 10:34:58PM +0100, Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
> 
>> It's actually hard to know the advantages of using SDE over a stock gcc.
>> The only difference I'm aware of is the smartmips ASE support in SDE.
>> But since this support is going to be added in stock gccs, I don't see
>> any advantages now and I'm wondering if I can give up using SDE...
> 
> In general terms the toolchain has been more reliable and had better
> support for MIPS processors before FSF gcc.
> 

Good point.

                Franck

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>