linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [IDE] Fix build bug

To: Sam Ravnborg <sam@ravnborg.org>
Subject: Re: [IDE] Fix build bug
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <bzolnier@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Oct 2007 23:52:31 +0200
Cc: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; bh=i3SWtubBdyAODaaKzcCFA1VkGn2KYU46A8nm61M3RYA=; b=iQ4/srVv87qj0hiDeQ16id9hYr6uHuFF8lCRHb9cNDTsxk3d4MaIevV2K+I9h/aeP/I7M3XRsVFs0kjimR7k8DNA1jsMwcLV/b5pJwgkyxUujjDfZccpISU2NYvvPLN1tDOZAoTbz4XWnOgmzWsEkNCl6fs6fTBsJ4rrzsgpeGk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:from:to:subject:date:user-agent:cc:references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:message-id; b=IEGgyvT1n7+CGo3B6hTYRzItdeyCMLjW8kM8zz5F64ww2o9RAvzHV+XfzFW8UuRk4UXz5Ej59nF5F1vvruLqlVisn2cnjkVXO60kx4lJHzQ0WvmliV0dLXzfRsHBSvHpC0Z5uvWmPEdd6hSwHrxLhumzrLPfNr7xSfCW+m/qO1s=
In-reply-to: <20071025141305.GA11698@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <20071025135334.GA23272@linux-mips.org> <20071025141305.GA11698@uranus.ravnborg.org>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: KMail/1.9.7
On Thursday 25 October 2007, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 02:53:34PM +0100, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> >   CC      drivers/ide/pci/generic.o
> > drivers/ide/pci/generic.c:52: error: __setup_str_ide_generic_all_on causes a
> > +section type conflict
> > 
> > This sort of build error is becoming a regular issue.  Either all or non
> > of the elements that go into a particular section of a compilation unit
> > need to be const.  Or an error may result such as in this case if
> > CONFIG_HOTPLUG is unset.
> So we can avoid this if we invent a __constinitdata tag that uses
> a new section?

I asked similar question on LKML few days ago together with the list of
potentially problematic places:

        http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/594427

Now I see that the list is only partially complete since __initdata and co.
may be also hidden in things like __setup() etc.

Thanks,
Bart

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>