| To: | Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] Use a sensible tlbex default for unknown CPUs |
| From: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Thu, 25 Oct 2007 18:08:04 +0100 (BST) |
| Cc: | linux-mips@linux-mips.org, ralf@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <20071025155912.GD3994@networkno.de> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <20071025155912.GD3994@networkno.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Thu, 25 Oct 2007, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> currently the kernel panics when it boots on an unknown CPU model
> (with an unknown PRID). Based on the assumption that the majority
> of newly supported CPU will conform to Release 2 standard, I wrote
> the appended patch which handles unknown CPUs as R2. It isn't
> completely bulletproof, as (yet unsupported) non-R1/R2 CPUs may
> use the AT config bits for different purposes. I still think this
> is good enough a test.
Good idea in general, but do we have to rely on the undefined? How
about this:
> + /* Panic if this isn't a Release 2 CPU. */
> + if (!((read_c0_config() & MIPS_CONF_AT) >> 13)) {
if (!(current_cpu_data.isa_level &
(MIPS_CPU_ISA_M64R2 | MIPS_CPU_ISA_M32R2))) {
instead for example?
Maciej
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] Use a sensible tlbex default for unknown CPUs, Thiemo Seufer |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [IDE] Fix build bug, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Use a sensible tlbex default for unknown CPUs, Thiemo Seufer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] Use a sensible tlbex default for unknown CPUs, Thiemo Seufer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |