[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [SPAM?] Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <>
Subject: Re: [SPAM?] Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code
From: Franck Bui-Huu <>
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 21:37:18 +0200
Cc: Nigel Stephens <>, Ralf Baechle <>, Thiemo Seufer <>,
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=a0V4KC5wcxV6qCZp4IzVExB7mmnr7KTbLDbRQCIcrHo=; b=WwRVcVmGbig9USMhA4V55B5iaVlTyY3hrGf9zy9oYukEysQwyxV25U1kZfLP9s1wL73KEwYoBcXKT5WpLFNca/ZsR4IjAqdRBD+/qYo/+fVNoUkeWb/BXDHZ+kOw1kUUINnUR7XipJBD1rQC5YlbbcX1G7UVaT9e7eqqZDNkkE0=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=H1Cz1wGKVg9ksos5xeqC5xUx4SicCVhMh0oiMBf94/KMrFHTPRwWUqEuQMo9rn0vQUFtUPNgWfnH2wQGZC7prmTvuk7tPKmJxhh5CfN2L6AfkLWWKbikKEhvzxZI9y0FAVt2g/bBrTNCDi1UJYgc3KF2+zz4W71qaeytEOoi5Tg=
In-reply-to: <>
Original-recipient: rfc822;
References: <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <> <>
User-agent: Thunderbird (X11/20070719)
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
>  Though either way I am not sure these would have to be put in Kconfig or 
> Makefile anywhere.  A generic way should be enough for the insistent as 
> the potentially useful options may proliferate; we have the CFLAGS_KERNEL 
> and CFLAGS_MODULE Makefile variables that would suit for setting upon 
> `make' invocation.

In that case very few people would use this optimization.

We could just have one new Kconfig option in kernel hacking submenu:

          If you want to pass additionnal option to GCC
          for optimization purpose for example, use this.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>