linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [PATCH] enable PCI bridges in MIPS ip32

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] enable PCI bridges in MIPS ip32
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 16:32:17 +0100
Cc: Giuseppe Sacco <giuseppe@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0710041624450.10573@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <E1IdO0a-0000n7-Cg@eppesuigoccas.homedns.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0710041316000.10573@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20071004130318.GC28928@linux-mips.org> <1191508413.10050.26.camel@scarafaggio> <20071004151951.GD6897@linux-mips.org> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0710041624450.10573@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12)
On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 04:27:57PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:

> On Thu, 4 Oct 2007, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> 
> > The entire testing done by chkslot() is probably not needed, so I suggest
> > you try to simply dump the thing entirely and test.
> 
>  Exactly what I wrote too. :-)  Though I would imagine it was introduced 
> for a reason, like a bug in the host bridge or something, as already 
> suggested.  Otherwise what would the point have been?

I suspect cut-and-paste-o-mania, probably originally started by the
necessity of doing so for the Galileo chips.

  Ralf

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>