| To: | Thiemo Seufer <ths@networkno.de> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code |
| From: | Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Thu, 04 Oct 2007 09:33:08 +0200 |
| Cc: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>, "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=NY7yn15/xxRye/FirViXaW2c9AwQLnIItbl67y6I6Rs=; b=UEnN2XR9tL58J/vFL++ts4S4YnJ/jdyt/O6To4gxbrbrbY5icYW1ehuAOS0t88AcktvfMEkg99gXlE0VjIP3xOeD61QxqgkggsZXM/heuYmjcSk6l0xoYh9Bl3ETrnA8JhIvQikAvG+mzYFFLhdY0xo6xXIPWzUN7nPw7gzL+Bo= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pPWtXsEpJVD2ln8eQhlq7tqPzhq4dWVEzqvIDyitrQYiDrCpFMKW01sEP6FkWhyD9tdBKKz2+jy2Cud+rSmMYdXw4F9ZkrfmpoPqcjAD5Pys6MhEwDRCHl1vw6uXyP6GuzzXniTpaBz2DtrnAX0ibYA48dJZIi1vWLehwjFozNw= |
| In-reply-to: | <20071003201800.GP16772@networkno.de> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0710021447470.32726@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20071002141125.GC16772@networkno.de> <20071002154918.GA11312@linux-mips.org> <47038874.9050704@gmail.com> <20071003131158.GL16772@networkno.de> <4703F155.4000301@gmail.com> <20071003201800.GP16772@networkno.de> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719) |
Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Franck Bui-Huu wrote:
>> Thiemo Seufer wrote:
>>> Then you have the worst of both approaches: The nicely readable
>>> disassembly will change under you feet, and you still need
>>> relocation annotations etc. for CPU-specific fixups. The end-result
>>> is likely more complicated and opaque than what we have now.
>> Let say we generate handlers with all possible cpu fixups. Very few
>> instructions would be removed so the disassembly should be quite
>> similar after patching.
>
> No way. Just check the possible variations: 64bit, highmem, SMP,
> and so on.
>
You just listed some variations that are known at compile time. What I
meant by "all possible cpu fixups" is all fixups for a specific cpu
which can be known only at runtime.
>> And by emitting some nice comments in the
>> generated code, it should be fairly obvious to get an idea of the
>> final code.
>>
>> All fixups would be listed in a table with some flags to identify them
>> and a list of instructions which need to be relocated.
>
> At that point you have invented something which effectively emits
> the sourcecode for tlbex.c.
>
Not really, I would say it's just an idea to remove tlbex.c from the
kernel code and to make it a tool called during compile time to
generate a handler skeleton which would be finalized by the kernel.
Thanks,
Franck
|
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH][MIPS][5/7] AR7: watchdog timer, Matteo Croce |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | unresoved symbol _gp_disp, veerasena reddy |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code, Thiemo Seufer |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |