| To: | Kumba <kumba@gentoo.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: What is the current state of the Octane/IP30 support? |
| From: | Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 3 Oct 2007 09:02:46 +0200 (CEST) |
| Cc: | Ed Stafford <ed.stafford@gmail.com>, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <47033156.7090703@gentoo.org> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <41370a610710021341g749742dejec06b3a38477fd47@mail.gmail.com> <47033156.7090703@gentoo.org> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
On Wed, 3 Oct 2007, Kumba wrote:
> For the most part, Impact-based systems run great. You get X, unaccelerated,
> no 3D, and a framebuffer. VPro, framebuffer, but no X. USB kinda weorks if
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
What's the reason for not having X? X doesn't support the frame buffer layout?
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
-- Linus Torvalds
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: What is the current state of the Octane/IP30 support?, Kumba |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [PATCH] mm/pg-r4k.c: Dump the generated code, Geert Uytterhoeven |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: What is the current state of the Octane/IP30 support?, Kumba |
| Next by Thread: | Re: What is the current state of the Octane/IP30 support?, Stuart Longland |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |