linux-mips
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 broken on IP32 since 2.6.20

To: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
Subject: Re: CONFIG_BUILD_ELF64 broken on IP32 since 2.6.20
From: Franck Bui-Huu <vagabon.xyz@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:11:49 +0200
Cc: Atsushi Nemoto <anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp>, tbm@cyrius.com, linux-mips@linux-mips.org
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xkCH4DOOmT2OI8ey0AU0M3Z0MhmFLzFCjHY/IgW6RJg=; b=RAzlJShk2K8T9ndkeo1sHDsBgf23WDVY3f/QkgSzgLLwvumOMnRmVdgCXBZiSSOvsHyg96e9WEhbufuITOx537UD9/VXnCNUuSvdxg/ODo7ZUCaMli15w8Jc8ta2v2Qn4Z/KiIwbiRJz3nPi8vxdJI1BEu+k1oJV2cuNJdMRyxk=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=JbBef4674YKAAe1fMngrf9vE6hx18NlDReyxgIVLobhIFnKUxoB+LW1kt3RJ2ftwyJeGsrKWmVX5aQcySz2bs7wTlw724GT5jnGHBLxEJs8AOUder1f95/VTtDhnBjgnZZAGQOzSnWs8BDmjmU8u6B/N4K7giq+MuHkKwpZGl0k=
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0709261644500.30122@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Original-recipient: rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org
References: <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0709261226340.30122@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <46FA5FFA.1060704@gmail.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0709261525510.30122@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> <20070927.003400.108121785.anemo@mba.ocn.ne.jp> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0709261644500.30122@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl>
Sender: linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.5 (X11/20070719)
Maciej W. Rozycki wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Sep 2007, Atsushi Nemoto wrote:
> 
>> Current linux-queue code adds -msym32 if the load address was CKSEG0,
>> so it can not be compiled with gcc 3.x.  I think this patch fixes the
>> problem:
>>
>> http://www.linux-mips.org/archives/linux-mips/2007-03/msg00404.html
> 
>  It looks like it should -- why hasn't it been pushed?
> 

I don't remember. I thought the last patchset had the fix.

Just to be sure I understand both of you correctly, could
you confirm that in case of '-msym32' switch isn't supported,
we should _silently_ drop this option ? That's what Atsushi
was suggesting. But reading what Maciej wrote, it seems that
we should notify the user...

                Franck

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>