| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: About openoffice linux/mips porting |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Sep 2007 14:36:03 +0100 |
| Cc: | Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@lemote.com>, debian-mips@lists.debian.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0709251406220.23669@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <46F90261.1000003@lemote.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0709251406220.23669@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) |
On Tue, Sep 25, 2007 at 02:10:31PM +0100, Maciej W. Rozycki wrote: > Hmm, why would anyone need to have asm snippets in a document processing > suite? And it looks like the bits are ABI-dependent, so at least three > variations (if the changes are endianness-safe) would be required to > handle all the ABIs that we support. > > It smells like OpenOffice is doing something outrageously wrong here... Normal madness of a (too!) complex piece of software. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: About openoffice linux/mips porting, Fuxin Zhang |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: About openoffice linux/mips porting, Thiemo Seufer |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: About openoffice linux/mips porting, David Daney |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH 0/4] Rename BCM947XX into BCM47XX, Aurelien Jarno |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |