| To: | "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: About openoffice linux/mips porting |
| From: | Fuxin Zhang <fxzhang@ict.ac.cn> |
| Date: | Tue, 25 Sep 2007 21:08:17 +0800 |
| Cc: | Fuxin Zhang <zhangfx@lemote.com>, debian-mips@lists.debian.org, linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| In-reply-to: | <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0709251406220.23669@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <46F90261.1000003@lemote.com> <Pine.LNX.4.64N.0709251406220.23669@blysk.ds.pg.gda.pl> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.0 (Windows/20070326) |
Maciej W. Rozycki 写道: Openoffice wants to be able to interact with plugins written in many languages, instead of writting a module for each possible combination it chooses the so called bridge: every language interact with a common middle language.On Tue, 25 Sep 2007, Fuxin Zhang wrote:It is available at http://qa.openoffice.org/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=81482, any comments are welcome. Have an official openoffice for linux/mips might be a good thing.Hmm, why would anyone need to have asm snippets in a document processing suite? And it looks like the bits are ABI-dependent, so at least three variations (if the changes are endianness-safe) would be required to handle all the ABIs that we support. It smells like OpenOffice is doing something outrageously wrong here... Maciej |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH] sb1250-mac: Driver model & phylib update, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: About openoffice linux/mips porting, Ralf Baechle |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: About openoffice linux/mips porting, Maciej W. Rozycki |
| Next by Thread: | Re: About openoffice linux/mips porting, Thiemo Seufer |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |