| To: | zhuzhenhua <zzh.hust@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel? |
| From: | Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Sep 2007 17:53:30 +0100 |
| Cc: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| In-reply-to: | <50c9a2250709111921g1b49cb0du7f97ebb3e1fb7d07@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <50c9a2250709111921g1b49cb0du7f97ebb3e1fb7d07@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
| User-agent: | Mutt/1.5.14 (2007-02-12) |
On Wed, Sep 12, 2007 at 10:21:53AM +0800, zhuzhenhua wrote: > i have a mips board, and the SDRAM speed(bus clock) is not too > fast. > so i want change the SAVE_ALL and RESTORE_ALL to use > internal-ram(high speed). > i just wonder whether the SAVE_ALL netsting in kernel for mips > arch? > if not, i think maybe 1k byte for SAVE_ALL is enough( 32regs > X4, and some cp0_regs). > but if the SAVE_ALL nesting, maybe i need to keep a stack in > internal-ram. > thanks for any hints. Nesting works but due to the use of k0/k1 you need to ensure SAVE_ALL is only invoked with interrupts disabled. Ralf |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [PATCH][MIPS][7/7] AR7: ethernet, Ralf Baechle |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [MIPS] SMTC: Fix crash on bootup with idebus= command line argument., Atsushi Nemoto |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel?, zhuzhenhua |
| Next by Thread: | [PATCH][MIPS] remove unused GT64120 definitions, Yoichi Yuasa |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |