| To: | zhuzhenhua <zzh.hust@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel? |
| From: | "Dajie Tan" <jiankemeng@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:30:32 +0400 |
| Cc: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=3El1LhmnAHlwxQ0qcFFW9qphOg7y+mBD7lfz/nj90Yc=; b=rW5cssBiI0c8BxcQim0TEJJw9h/tY5qhmK50vQhDUmzvpqVp79UTpp/5YDxWq0QFBw03fWepW3tS1KFWAfQiOBvqfaG0tre/KrhpPk+d+cR8ck3a3hY+lYrdUwXRd3nbF7p2B6P2h2b7iPpwDQiZ8uGa1WaNSe++3fjoTYAu3bQ= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=pu1YKwgUrwPBN85PGaDe5hWaalf6aDxw61nxgnYcDJqpwt6Vi/HhskLwWnV9KAPVh7QWBnNcCzf2yXwgOb92+AvPiX7G8OMctmOeZVt5SQPR3HYFRSOIon59QqSCSEikyQpms/fVthOKh4HURARQXlp/uU4wixVEhh0L2ShSToo= |
| In-reply-to: | <5861a7880709112017ue2d5d55k6e722f73daedbd9d@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <50c9a2250709111921g1b49cb0du7f97ebb3e1fb7d07@mail.gmail.com> <5861a7880709112017ue2d5d55k6e722f73daedbd9d@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
You can see this document for more details: http://www.xtrj.org/mips/default.htm or the document for analysing the process of exception and interrupt of mips linux: http://people.openrays.org/~comcat/mydoc/mips.linux.inter.pdf 2007/9/12, Dajie Tan <jiankemeng@gmail.com>: > Which exception handler do you want to be nested? > > If it's not a interrupt handler you can use STI(enable interrupts) or > CLI(disable interrupts) after SAVE_ALL for nesting support. They all > clear EXL bit in CP0_STATUS register and set the KSU=00. > > > 2007/9/12, zhuzhenhua <zzh.hust@gmail.com>: > > hello, all > > i have a mips board, and the SDRAM speed(bus clock) is not too > > fast. > > so i want change the SAVE_ALL and RESTORE_ALL to use > > internal-ram(high speed). > > i just wonder whether the SAVE_ALL netsting in kernel for mips > > arch? > > if not, i think maybe 1k byte for SAVE_ALL is enough( 32regs > > X4, and some cp0_regs). > > but if the SAVE_ALL nesting, maybe i need to keep a stack in > > internal-ram. > > thanks for any hints. > > > > Best Regards > > > > -- > > zzh > > > > > > > -- > 为天地立心 > 为生民立命 > 为往圣继绝学 > 为万世开太平 > -- 为天地立心 为生民立命 为往圣继绝学 为万世开太平 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel?, Dajie Tan |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel?, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel?, Dajie Tan |
| Next by Thread: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel?, Kevin D. Kissell |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |