| To: | zhuzhenhua <zzh.hust@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel? |
| From: | "Dajie Tan" <jiankemeng@gmail.com> |
| Date: | Wed, 12 Sep 2007 07:17:07 +0400 |
| Cc: | linux-mips <linux-mips@linux-mips.org> |
| Dkim-signature: | v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=hjqDP28Octbk8Bfu59wV8yCOgvKAyjAWHZomrYmmgXQ=; b=cNfzFciO559cSV+ONlCw75F3zhnYSeJtgKkuupMN4R7jzVegIUB63D9yevCSA/MkILaVbR0tV9HASIpQ850UmmEHAnk1MFI6nm6RLUS+k707GG/qRZNZqZLFKnSojb+OLDA3zC++7ImClsFsAO7SG9QoXwl/Fx7i+TIQx/O57AI= |
| Domainkey-signature: | a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=o+2iE8Fts8ewMI7Cnj4QbJjQ9mClLnpxcrvnYjwcpK77QwCfw46Z5HIuYSR9f4fvLoKetteChb89Qfjk2y4jdGhbexE/tNmlblME6+hoA8tjdx1BF77xaTh6L7P0Z1NRN9S+94Ni75va8wNNjr3XO2W/cmrXf9AQm/dRvx2BXA0= |
| In-reply-to: | <50c9a2250709111921g1b49cb0du7f97ebb3e1fb7d07@mail.gmail.com> |
| Original-recipient: | rfc822;linux-mips@linux-mips.org |
| References: | <50c9a2250709111921g1b49cb0du7f97ebb3e1fb7d07@mail.gmail.com> |
| Sender: | linux-mips-bounce@linux-mips.org |
Which exception handler do you want to be nested? If it's not a interrupt handler you can use STI(enable interrupts) or CLI(disable interrupts) after SAVE_ALL for nesting support. They all clear EXL bit in CP0_STATUS register and set the KSU=00. 2007/9/12, zhuzhenhua <zzh.hust@gmail.com>: > hello, all > i have a mips board, and the SDRAM speed(bus clock) is not too > fast. > so i want change the SAVE_ALL and RESTORE_ALL to use > internal-ram(high speed). > i just wonder whether the SAVE_ALL netsting in kernel for mips > arch? > if not, i think maybe 1k byte for SAVE_ALL is enough( 32regs > X4, and some cp0_regs). > but if the SAVE_ALL nesting, maybe i need to keep a stack in > internal-ram. > thanks for any hints. > > Best Regards > > -- > zzh > > -- 为天地立心 为生民立命 为往圣继绝学 为万世开太平 |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel?, zhuzhenhua |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel?, Dajie Tan |
| Previous by Thread: | does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel?, zhuzhenhua |
| Next by Thread: | Re: does the SAVE_ALL nesting in kernel?, Dajie Tan |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |